IN DEFENSE OF ISLAM: The Use of the Word "MODERATES" for Muslims

It does not make sense to me when we use the word "moderates" to identity a certain group of Muslims, who are more inclusive, pluralist, and not extremists, not fanatics, not radicals.

Why?

By calling them moderate Muslims, subconsciously we acknowledge that "Muslims are generally not moderates - however there are some who are moderates."

We do not use the word "moderate" for Christians, Buddhista, Hindus, or the followers of any other religion - who are inclusive, pluralist, and not extremists, not fanatics, not radicals.

We do, however, identify the radicals among them as "radicals".

What does this imply?
It implies, that "generally speaking, they are not radicals, with the exception of few".

Can we see the difference?

By this wrong notion, we have created a collective fear for Islam, and Muslims.
By using the word "moderate" to identify certain Islamic groups - we have actually made a big, big blunder. We have created a negative image of Islam.

I am not sure if the so-called moderates are aware of this or not - but, one thing is certain. They are taking full advantage of this by enriching themselves with funds from USA, Europe, as well as some Middle Eastern countries by posing themselves as heroes, and their organizations as the sole hope against increasing radicalism.

We have to change this.
Islam must be projected as the Religion of Peace, of Salaam.... The wars fought during Prophet's lifetime, and following Him, should be seen as contextual, and in response to the need of the hour. They are not relevant for all times.

Islam must awaken to its true glory, and all of us, Muslims and non-Muslims have a role to play in this. For, we are interdependent. Any harm to Islam is harm to all of us, whoever we are, and whatever religion we follow.

Salaam, Shalom, Sadhu, Om Shanti
www.aumkar.org